Grand Final Venue
Four Points by Sheraton
Ungasan, Bali
The exhibition and final-stage gathering will take place in a resort setting with a dedicated hospitality environment for international participants.
View on Google MapsCompetition
Grand Final Mechanism
The final phase is designed as a structured academic summit that combines exhibition, scientific judging, and international-stage presentation standards.
4 Days / 3 Nights
Event Schedule
A concise run of arrival, judging, cultural program, and departure.
Day 1
October 8
Arrival & Check-in.
Day 2
October 9
Opening Ceremony & Scientific Judging Session (Presentation).
Day 3
October 10
Bali Cultural Tour & Awarding Ceremony.
Day 4
October 11
Departure.
Live Presentation Format
The Judging Session
Participants will present in a room with a panel of judges.
Presentation5 min
Strictly timed oral presentation.
Q&A5 min
Direct response to the judging panel.
Total10 min
Complete session time allocated per team.
Judging Criteria
IRCYS 2026 utilizes an integrated judging system with the total score divided into two main phases: Full Paper Review (40%) and Live Final Presentation (60%). Judges will score each sub-criteria on a scale of 0 to 5 (based on the scoring guide in the rubric).
TRACK 1: THEORETICAL STUDIES (Science & Social)
Judging focuses on the depth of methodology and scientific analysis in the text (40%) and the mastery of the material and ability to defend arguments (60%).
| JUDGING PHASE | WEIGHT | CRITERIA FOCUS |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Full Paper Review | 40% | Background & Problem, Research Methodology, Written Data Analysis, Scientific Writing |
| Phase 2: Live Final (Presentation) | 60% | Mastery of Material, Depth of Oral Analysis, Originality (Novelty), Question & Answer (Q&A), Presentation Technique |
TRACK 2: APPLIED STUDIES (Engineering & Technology)
Judging focuses on the quality of technical design and product testing data (40%) and the proof of function and feasibility of the innovation (60%).
| JUDGING PHASE | WEIGHT | CRITERIA FOCUS |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Full Paper Review | 40% | Technical Problem & Objective, Design & Construction, Testing Data, Technical Writing |
| Phase 2: Live Final (Presentation) | 60% | Functional Proof, Quality of Innovation, Feasibility, Question & Answer (Q&A), Presentation Technique |
TRACK 3: HUMANITY STUDIES (Humanity & Social Intervention)
Judging focuses on the social context and intervention methods in the report (40%) and the storytelling of impact and sustainability (60%).
| JUDGING PHASE | WEIGHT | CRITERIA FOCUS |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Full Paper Review | 40% | Social Context, Intervention Method, Impact Evaluation, Report Narrative |
| Phase 2: Live Final (Presentation) | 60% | Proof of Impact, Sustainability, Empathy & Context, Question & Answer (Q&A), Presentation Technique |
Need Full Grand Final Guideline?
Download the participant guideline for complete scoring rubric, track criteria, and final round preparation.
Download Participants Guideline